West Seattle Land & Improvement Co. v. Novelty Mill Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. William R. Bell, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mount, J.
— The appellant brought this action in the lower court to eject the respondent from the possession of certain real estate upon which is situated a flouring mill and other valuable property. The complaint alleges title in appellant and right of possession, and that the respondent wrongfully withholds possession from appellant. The answer denies the allegations of the complaint, and for a first affirmative defense alleges title, possession, and right of possession in respondent; for a second affirmative defense alleges facts which respondent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Garrett v. ChristopherTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Balch v. ArnoldWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
- Anderson v. Wallace Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Ankeny v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1889
- Spiess v. NeubergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McKinley v. Mineral Hill Consolidated Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
- Henningsen v. StrombergMontana Supreme Court · 1950
- Brenner v. J. J. Brenner Oyster Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
- Bradley v. FacklerWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- State ex rel. Dunbar v. ShokutaWashington Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.