Legal Opinion

Balch v. Arnold

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1899PublishedCited by 32 opinions

EreoR to the District Court, Albany County, Hon. Charles W. Bramel, Judge. This was an action brought by the Laramie National Bank, Henry Gr. Balch and Charles C. Frazer upon certain promissory notes owned by the bank, executed by Thomas Bird, and to foreclose a trust deed given to secure the payment of the notes. The defendant Constantine P. Arnold claimed under a prior mortgage, made to one Frederick Bell, and transferred to Baid Arnold.

Read the full summary

EreoR to the District Court, Albany County, Hon. Charles W. Bramel, Judge. This was an action brought by the Laramie National Bank, Henry Gr. Balch and Charles C. Frazer upon certain promissory notes owned by the bank, executed by Thomas Bird, and to foreclose a trust deed given to secure the payment of the notes. The defendant Constantine P. Arnold claimed under a prior mortgage, made to one Frederick Bell, and transferred to Baid Arnold. After reply and a demurrer thereto, the demurrer was sustained and judgment rendered upon the pleadings in favor of the defendant Arnold. The plaintiffs…

1Opinion of the Court

Corn, Justice.

This was a suit upon certain promissory notes owned by the bank and executed by Thomas Bird, one of the defendants in the court below, and to foreclose a mortgage and a trust deed upon certain lands by which the notes were secured. The defendant, Arnold, answered, setting up a promissory note of the defendant Bird for the sum of two thousand dollars, made payable to Frederick Bell, now owned by Arnold and secured by mortgage upon the same lands covered by the mortgage and trust deed of the plaintiffs. The Arnold note and mortgage were executed on October, 15, 1883, and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Galveston Railroad v. CowdreySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. F. J. Harrison & Co. v. BoringTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Pennock v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  4. Garrett v. ChristopherTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Lindsay v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. HartmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. J. W. Denio Milling Co. v. MalinWyoming Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Witzel v. WitzelWyoming Supreme Court · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API