Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n

oconcurring). I concur in the majority’s analysis and conclusion that the minority/insanity tolling provision of the Revised Judicature Act, MCL 600.5851(1), does not toll the one-year-back rule of the no-fault automobile insurance act, MCL 500.3145(1).11 write separately to elaborate on the majority’s analysis and to express certain reservations concerning the decision reached in these opinions.(1) I am concerned that as a consequence of this decision, the protections afforded by the tolling provision may become increasingly illusory. This provision allows minors and insane persons to bring…