Schweitzer v. Board of Forensic Polygraph Examiners
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, J.
These cases involve original complaints for mandamus, GCR 1963, 714, to compel the Michigan State Board of Forensic Polygraph Examiners to issue plaintiffs Schweitzer and Feist polygraph examiners licenses under the grandfather clause contained in § 9 of the Forensic Polygraph Examiners Act, 1972 PA 295; MCLA 338.1701 et seq.; MSA 18.186(1) et seq. Both plaintiffs applied for licenses under § 9 of the act, MCLA 338.1709; MSA 18.186(9), and eventually the board denied both applications.
Plaintiffs’ applications were timely filed under § 9. Neither applicant received immediate action on his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. BarbaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. ButlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Bischoff v. County of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Michigan State Dental Society v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Kelly Downs, Inc v. Racing CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Waterford School District v. State Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- O’connell v. Director of ElectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Saginaw Valley Trotting Ass'n v. Michigan Racing CommissionerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Coates v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Ferency v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.