Legal Opinion

People v. Pollack

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1951No. Crim. 4631PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial after conviction of violating section 337a, subdivision 1, of the California Penal Code,* 1 defendant appeals.

Facts-. On May 10, 1950, police officers of the city of Los Angeles saw defendant leave a restaurant and enter a car. The officers followed him to a hotel which he entered. After about two minutes he returned to the car and drove to another part of the city where he parked and entered a residence. He remained on the premises about 10 or 15 minutes after which time he drove to another residence where he proceeded to the house…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. CopplaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. People v. CahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. People v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API