Legal Opinion

People v. Stanley

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1957No. Crim. No. 5869PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Defendant was convicted of violation of subdivision 3, section 337a, Penal Code, bookmaking.1 Motion for new trial was denied, further proceedings suspended and probation granted. Defendant appealed from “the judgment. ’ ’ For purposes of appeal the order granting probation falls within that term. (Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. 1.) Defendant also appealed from the order denying a new trial.

The sole contention made by appellant’s counsel is that the evidence is insufficient to establish a corpus delicti, in that there was no proof that horse races upon which defendant took bets were actually run.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. People v. SutherlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. People v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. CudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. People v. NewmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API