Legal Opinion

Cisneros v. ABC Rail Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 7, 2000No. 99-1364PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

The primary issue presented by this case is whether the exhaustion requirements and limitation periods of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(D(l), and the Colorado Antidiscrimination Act, Colo.Rev.Stat. § 24-34-306(11), (14), apply to an action brought by an employee to enforce a conciliation agreement resolving a prior employment discrimination claim. We must also resolve, as a preliminary matter, whether this Court has subject matter jurisdiction under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. We conclude that we have jurisdiction and, under the plain…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Rodriguez-AguirreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Garley v. Sandia Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. Felix v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. Adams v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Benavidez v. Sandia National LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API