Legal Opinion
Harbuck v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 29, 2003No. 02-1829CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This civilian pay case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff alleges that she suffered employment-related *267discrimination on the basis of sex, in violation of the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA), 29 U.S.C. § 206.
On February 27, 2001, plaintiff filed a complaint against the government in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia (District Court), alleging, inter alia, the same EPA violation as is involved in the present case. Plaintiff subsequently became aware of this court’s EPA…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bonnie Harbuck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Mansfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Mastrolia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Tohono O'Odham Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Cooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.