Legal Opinion
Mansfield v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 30, 2006No. 05-472CPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILLIAMS, Judge.
Plaintiff Judith A. Mansfield, a female employee at the Library of Congress (LOC), alleges that the LOC violated the Equal Pay Act by paying male employees higher wages for doing substantially the same work under similar circumstances. Specifically, Plaintiff claims that she was paid less than four male employees — her supervisor when she was temporarily promoted to his position, two coworkers in the same position and a co-worker she supervised. Additionally, Plaintiff claims that the LOC violated the Equal Pay…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cora Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District and Cattaraugus County Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Rogers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- SGS-92-X003 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Cooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Canal 66 Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.