Legal Opinion
Bonnie Harbuck v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 10, 2004No. 04-5013PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Section 1500 of Title 28 of the United States Code denies the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction over “any claims” with respect to which the plaintiff “has pending in any other court any suit ... against the United States.” The district court transferred one count of a complaint to the Court of Federal Claims. Under the transfer statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (2000), the claims in the Court of Federal Claims are deemed to have been filed on the same date as the plaintiff filed her district court suit. The Court of Federal Claims dismissed the suit before it for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Unr Industries, Inc., Unarco Industries, Inc., and Eagle Picher Industries, Inc. v. The United States, Keene Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- South Carolina v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Mansfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Mastrolia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Tohono O'Odham Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Astornet Technologies Inc. v. Bae Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.