State v. Taylor
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The defendant assigns as error certain portions of the charge. However, no exceptions were taken to such portions of the charge upon which an assignment of error may rest.
It is the general rule that assignments of error not supported by exceptions duly and timely noted, will not be considered upon appeal. S. v. Oliver, 213 N.C. 386, 196 S.E. 325; In re Will of Beard, 202 N.C. 661, 163 S.E. 748; Dixon v. Osborne, 201 N.C. 489, 160 S.E. 579. For exceptions to this rule see S. v. Dockery, 238 N.C. 222, 77 S.E. 2d 664, and S. v. Parnell, 214 N.C. 467, 199 S.E. 601.
The instant case, however, does…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. DockerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Dixon v. . OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- In Re Will of BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. . BowenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Beaver v. Crawford Paint Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. CrumlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977