Legal Opinion

State v. Crumlin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

. Per Curiam.

The evidence adduced in the trial below is sufficient to support the verdict, and the assignments of error point out no error that would justify a new trial. Moreover, the exceptions to the charge appear only in connection with the assignments of error; no exceptions were taken and set out in the record to the portions of the charge of which the defendant complains. Therefore, the assignments of error relating to the charge have no exceptions upon which such assignments may rest. Barnette v. Woody, 242 N.C. 424, 88 S.E. 2d 223; S. v. Taylor, 240 N.C. 117, 80 S.E. 2d 917. .

No…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MemsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API