Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Black

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Circuit Court for Winnebago County. cited Davis v. Slagle, 27 Mo. 600; Denslow v. Van Horn, 16 Iowa, 476 ; Kniffen v. McConnell, 30 N. Y. 285.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

This is an action to recover damages for a breach of promise of marriage. Among other matters, the defendant set up in his answer that during the time the plaintiff claimed to have been waiting for the defendant to come to her place of residence to marry her, she was using her best endeavors to marry one McGill, and that she did during the same time receive visits from different men with a view to matrimony. There was some testimony offered in support of this part of the answer. And the court was asked,on behalf of the defendant, to instruct the jury that if they found the fact to be that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kniffen v. . McConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Denslow v. Van HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  3. Davis v. SlagleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Haymond v. SaucerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. White v. BenkowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Mid-Continent Refrigerator Co. v. StrakaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Kurtz v. FrankIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Leavitt v. CutlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API