Mid-Continent Refrigerator Co. v. Straka
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
Three issues have been presented by the parties:
1. Did the trial court err in not submitting a question in the verdict as to punitive damages ?
2. Did the trial court err in restricting the testimony of the defendant Straka as to the damages he sustained?
3. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in refusing to award costs to plaintiff and in awarding them to the defendant?
The plaintiff, Mid-Continent, accepts the jury finding-in the circuit court that its sales representative fraudulently represented to Straka that the display freezer he was leasing was an automatic defrosting unit which in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Kink v. CombsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Malco, Inc. v. Midwest Aluminum Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Luther v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Michalski v. WagnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Collins v. Eli Lilly & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- McCullough v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Fehring v. Republic InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.