Legal Opinion

Murray v. Specialty Chemicals Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1979PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Frederic E. Hammer, J.

Defendant Anker Lumber, Inc., moves for an order vacating the statement of readiness and striking this action from the Trial Calendar. A motion is brought by defendant Specialty Chemicals Co. seeking similar relief.

The motions are predicated upon the refusal of plaintiff Mary Murray to submit to a psychiatric examination at the office of a doctor unless her attorney is permitted to sit in at the examination, and upon failure to furnish other items of discovery.

CPLR 3121 states:

"(a) Notice of examination. After commencement of an action in which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Milam v. MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Del Ra v. VaughanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jakubowski v. LengenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Di Bari v. Incaica Cia Armadora, S.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
  3. Reardon v. Port AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Savarese v. Yonkers Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Gray v. Victory Memorial HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API