Milam v. Mitchell
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHarold P. Kelly, J.
The defendants, Mitchell and Leonard!, move for an order to require the plaintiff to submit to a physical and psychiatric examination by the defendants’ doctors. The plaintiff does not oppose the examinations but requests that he be permitted to have a court reporter present at the psychiatric examination to report and transcribe the questions and answers of the psychiatrist and the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s attorney states that the reason be desires the transcript of the examination is to enable him to cross-examine the psychiatrist on trial and to be better able to enquire into the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Gonzi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Glassberg v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jakubowski v. LengenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Di Bari v. Incaica Cia Armadora, S.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Reardon v. Port AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1986
- Savarese v. Yonkers Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Murray v. Specialty Chemicals Co.New York Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.