Legal Opinion
State v. Padilla
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 8, 1982No. 5577PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
Defendant was convicted under § 30-19-3B and C, N.M.S.A.1978, of commercial gambling. He contends on appeal that transcripts of taped telephone conversations were admitted without proper foundation; that evidence of an incorrect translation of one of the tapes by a State’s witness was improperly withheld from the jury; and that the court imposed a sentence not authorized by § 31-20-6, N.M.S.A.1978. Another issue raised in the docketing statement was not briefed and is deemed abandoned. State v. Gonzales, 96 N.M. 556, 632 P.2d 1194 (Ct.App.1981).
1. Admissibility of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Hugh MacLeod Pheaster, United States of America v. Angelo IncisoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Larry KnohlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Eugene C. Kirk, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. CuestaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. LackNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hovey v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HenryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.