Legal Opinion

State v. Henry

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1984No. 6003PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Chief Judge.

On remand from the Supreme Court we review defendant’s appeal from his conviction for criminal sexual contact with a minor, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-9-13. Defendant raises three issues on appeal: (1) denial of defendant’s right to be present at a critical stage of the trial; (2) failure of defendant’s attorney to permit him to testify; and (3) refusal of the trial court to excuse a juror for cause. A fourth point raised by defendant, failure of the trial court to grant a mistrial following the prosecutor’s comments on defendant’s failure to testify, has…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. State v. AlbrightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BoeglinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State v. RammingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. PettigrewNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. SingletonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API