Legal Opinion

Aultz v. Zucht

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 26, 1919No. 6167PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; R. B. Minor, Judge. Suit by A. D. Zucht and others against A. A. Aultz and another. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

This is a suit by A. D. Zucht, 1. L. Feller, and. Lottie Zucht, as partners, against A. A. Aultz, and W. T. Tivy, alleging that about twelve years prior to the filing of the suit plaintiffs had adopted and continuously thereafter used, • in the city of San Antonio, the trade-name, “Union Painless Dentists”; that they had. built up a good business and acquired an extensive good will under said trade-name; that about six months prior to the institution of the suit the defendants, for the purpose of deceiving the public and inducing the belief that they were the persons carrying on said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cohen v. NagleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Enoch Morgan's Sons Co. v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
  3. Regent Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. HaakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Cobe v. LovanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  5. Nolan Bros. Shoe Co. v. NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burge v. Dallas Retail Merchants Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Harrelson v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Henry Furnace Co. v. KappelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Texas State OpticalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Clifton Mfg. Co. v. Crawford-Austin Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API