Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Texas State Optical

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 23, 1952No. 4800PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

This proceeding is a suit to compel the Southwestern Bell Telephone Company to list the name of a telephone subscriber under a heading in the classified section of the telephone directory issued in Port Arthur, Texas.

The plaintiffs are the appellees. They are Dr. N. Jay Rogers and Dr. S. J. Rogers. They are licensed optometrists and practice their profession as a partnership, of which they are the sole members. This partnership is also engaged in business as opticians. To this partnership plaintiffs have given the trade name “Texas State Optical”, and they have operated their…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. People v. . BuddNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & NavigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Paragon Oil Syndicate v. Rhoades Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1925

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Carp v. Texas State Board of Examiners in OptometryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Dollar a Day Rent a Car Systems Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. A-ABC Appliance of Texas, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Loring v. Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API