Legal Opinion
Nolan Bros. Shoe Co. v. Nolan
California Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1900No. S.F. No. 1455PublishedCited by 12 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
Two brothers by the name of Nolan wer'e engaged for ten years in carrying on a wholesale shoe business in the city of San Francisco under the name of “Nolan Bros.” One brother sold his interest in the business to the other, and that brother (W. II. Nolan) shortly thereafter closed out the wholesale business and opened"up a retail shoe business at another point in the city under the name of “W. H. Nolan & Co., Successor to Nolan Bros.” A third brother, P. F. Nolan, had been engaged in the retail shoe business in the city of San Francisco for twenty-two years, some of this time in company with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- England v. New York Publishing Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1878
- Coleman, Burden & Warthen Co. v. Dannenberg Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Hall v. HolstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Jackman v. MauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Schwartz v. Slenderella Systems of Calif.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Northwest Ready Roofing Co. v. AntesNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.