Legal Opinion

Burleson v. Saffle

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 27, 2002No. CQ-2002-140PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANSWERING CERTIFIED QUESTION OF LAW

CHAPEL, Judge:

T1 The Honorable Carlos F. Lucero, Presiding Judge for a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, has certified the following question pursuant to the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act:1

On August 1, 1997, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals held that "where a vehicle is used to facilitate the intentional discharge of a weapon during a single transaction or 'shooting event' only one count of Using a Vehicle to Facilitate the Intentional Discharge of a Firearm [Okla. Stat. Tit.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Hunnicutt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. State v. FerreiraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. PamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. Rhoades v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. United States v. HammonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. Goree v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. Burleson v. SaffleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API