Legal Opinion

United States v. Pam

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2017No. 16-2171PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McHUGH, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION.

After pleading guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C; §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), Larry Pam was sentenced to a fifteen-year term of imprisonment consistent with a plea agreement entered into pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C). Mr. Pam’s fifteen-year sentence exceeds the ten-year statutory maximum generally applicable to violations of § 922(g)(1). See 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2). But the district court accepted the Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement and imposed the agreed-upon sentence…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Borden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  2. United States v. Eric VerwiebeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Jarnaro MiddletonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. DeiterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Latroy BurrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API