Legal Opinion
State v. Bollig
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 2000No. 98-2196-CRPublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶1. The petitioner, George Bollig, seeks review of a published decision of the court of appeals affirming the circuit court's denial of his motion to withdraw his plea. Bol-lig contends that his no contest plea to attempted sexual assault was unknowingly made because the circuit court failed to inform him of the registration requirement for sex offenders and failed to advise him of one of the essential elements of the offense.
¶ 2. He further asserts that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in concluding that the plea withdrawal would substantially prejudice the State and…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Ward v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Virsnieks v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- People v. GravinoNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ByrgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.