Legal Opinion

State v. Workman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1981No. 16922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Defendant appeals his bench trial conviction of rape and burglary. His sole contention on appeal is that he was denied a fair trial because the prosecution did not disclose the full content of statements he allegedly made to a trial witness.

The preliminary hearing was held on May 8, 1979. The state presented its case and rested. Thereupon, defense counsel (Robert Van Sciver), 1 called Deputy Sheriff Virgil Johnson as a witness. Johnson testified that he expected one Connie Riley to appear as a witness at trial. This prompted the following colloquy excerpted from the record:

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. State v. HornIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. BookerUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. ChristoffersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. State v. KirilukCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API