Legal Opinion

State v. Booker

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1985No. 18930PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendant Darrell Keith Booker appeals from a conviction for aggravated sexual assault. U.C.A., 1953, § 76-5-405 (Supp. 1983). Booker questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, the prejudicial effect of the prosecution’s failure to provide Booker with certain testimony of the State’s witnesses in advance of trial, and the failure of the trial court to give a cautionary Telfaire-type instruction regarding the eyewitness identification of Booker. We reject all challenges and affirm the conviction.

The pertinent facts are set forth in some detail…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. State v. PetreeUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. McCardellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. MalmroseUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. LammUtah Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API