State v. Kiriluk
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION 1
BILLINGS, Judge:
¶ 1 Defendant John Kiriluk appeals his conviction of criminal homicide, a first degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-203 (Supp.1997). We affirm.
FACTS
¶ 2 “In reviewing a jury verdict, we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in a light most favorable to the verdict. We recite the facts accordingly.” State v. Hamilton, 827 P.2d 232, 233-34 (Utah 1992) (citations omitted). However, we are mindful that we must determine if the evidence relied upon by the jury “is so compelling that we can conclude, beyond a reasonable…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. KohlUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Peña v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Pena v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Hadden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.