Legal Opinion

State v. Kiriluk

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 11, 1999No. 971200-CAPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION 1

BILLINGS, Judge:

¶ 1 Defendant John Kiriluk appeals his conviction of criminal homicide, a first degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-203 (Supp.1997). We affirm.

FACTS

¶ 2 “In reviewing a jury verdict, we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in a light most favorable to the verdict. We recite the facts accordingly.” State v. Hamilton, 827 P.2d 232, 233-34 (Utah 1992) (citations omitted). However, we are mindful that we must determine if the evidence relied upon by the jury “is so compelling that we can conclude, beyond a reasonable…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. KohlUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Peña v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Pena v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Hadden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API