Legal Opinion

Fry v. Hoffman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1913No. 8,025Published

Prom Henry Circuit Court; Ed Jackson, Judge. Action by Ott Hoffman and others against Marshall A. Pry and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

6. On petition for rehearing appellants complain of the failure of the court to pass upon the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. This question was not considered for the reason that it was not presented by appellants’ brief in accordance with the rules of this court. The petition for rehearing is overruled.

Note.—Reported in 102 N. E. 167; 103 N. E. 15. See, also, under (1) 2 Cyc. 989; (2) 3 Cyc. 294, 295; (3) 38 Cyc. 317; (4) 11 Cyc. 740, 741; (5) 9 Cyc. 143; (6) 2 Cyc. 1014, 1015. As to inclusion or exclusion of first and last days…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fry v. HoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API