Legal Opinion

Shill v. Jones

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1920No. Civil No. 1767PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment..of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. E. C. Stanford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This action was instituted by the appellant, herein called plaintiff, against the appellees, herein called defendants, for damages. The plaintiff alleges'in his complaint that he was at the time of the alleged injury, and is now, the owner of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of section 34, township 2 north, range 5 east, Grila and Salt Eiver base and meridian, Maricopa county; that the defendants had constructed a dam across the Salt Eiver for the purpose of diverting the waters thereof into a canal, constructed and maintained by defendants, running along and adjacent to his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harn v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Bristol v. Carolina Clinchfield & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Bristol v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Stansfield v. DunneArizona Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Posner v. New York Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Huish v. LopezArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. MacNeil v. VanceArizona Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API