Legal Opinion

Posner v. New York Life Insurance

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1940No. Civil No. 4198PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an action by Rose Posner, hereinafter called plaintiff, to recover certain benefits which she claimed were due her upon a policy issued by New York Life Insurance Company, a corporation, hereinafter called defendant. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. Judgment was rendered thereon, and the case is before us for review.

The undisputed facts are as follows: On May 25, 1928, defendant issued to plaintiff its policy of life insurance which provided, among other things, for the payment of certain benefits to the latter in case of total and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BrubakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Price v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. ReynoldsArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Clardy v. Grand Lodge of Oklahoma, A. O. U. W.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Trull v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. HarrodArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Berry v. HarmonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. State v. DruryArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Dale G. Button and Glorianna Button, Husband and Wife v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Cigna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Menefee v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API