Legal Opinion

Struble, Admr. v. Struble

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1932No. 3987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, PJ.

The evidence sustains all the allegations of the amended petition.

The jury rendered a verdict for the full amount claimed. The court granted a remittitur of $2,000.00.

The chief contention of the plaintiff in error is, that no recovery can be had upon the contract for the reason that it is void under the statute of frauds.

The contract was in effect an agreement to make a will, or execute some other conveyance, by which Clarence should receive all the father’s property at his death. Clarence fully performed his contract, and there was a complete failure on the part of the father to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ardinger v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Beckler v. BaconOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Bemis v. Bemis, Exrx.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API