Legal Opinion

Crowley v. Clark County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1935PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed June 4, 1935 :

Neeson, J.

It is earnestly contended on behalf of the plaintiff that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer interposed by Clark county. It is argued that the operation of the grader upon the highway after dark without its carrying “at least two red signal lanterns or lights” unnecessarily obstructed the highway and constituted a nuisance for which the county should respond in damages for all injuries caused thereby. It is sought to uphold the sufficiency of the complaint under such cases as Little v. Madison, 42 Wis. 643; Hughes v. Fond…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hughes v. City of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Apfelbacher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Little v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Scory v. LaFaveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sonneborn v. SylvesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Heiden v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Green County v. City of MonroeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Firemen's Insurance v. Washburn CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Robb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API