Legal Opinion
In Re the Complaint Regarding the Annexation of a Portion of the Service Territory of People's Cooperative Power Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 14, 1991No. C1-90-2485, C1-90-2499PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
The City of Rochester appeals the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission’s determination that it must pay compensation to a rural electric cooperative pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 216B.44 (1988). We affirm.
FACTS
In 1987, the City of Rochester annexed two subdivisions (North Park and North Park II) covering an area previously within the electric service territory of People’s Cooperative Power Association. Rochester then began extending electric service into North Park. The co-op filed a complaint with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission seeking compensation due to a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Appleton Water Works Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Matter of Hibbing Taconite Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Whitley County Rural Electric Membership Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. LaBarreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- In re the Complaint by Kandiyohi Cooperative Electric Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Lexington v. Dawson County Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Moorhead v. Red River Valley Cooperative Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re City of Rochester for an Adjustment of Its Service Area Boundaries With People's Cooperative Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re Petition by the City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.