Legal Opinion

St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Salovich

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 27, 1985No. 6787-1-IIPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, J.

Defendants George Salovich and his wife, Doris, d/b/a Cowlitz Electric and Plumbing Supply, appeal the trial court's judgment in favor of plaintiff, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (St. Paul), which denied coverage under a fire insurance policy based upon the jury's determination that the defendants intentionally misrepresented or concealed material facts in their proof of loss claim. Defendants contend the court erred by instructing that St. Paul's burden of proving misrepresentation or concealment of material facts was by a preponderance of the evidence rather than by clear, cogent, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Caruso v. Local Union No. 690Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Sigman v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Khadouri Chaachou v. American Central Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kastanis v. Educational Employees Credit UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Tran v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Tran v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Ki Sin Kim v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API