Purgason v. Dillon
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Judge.
Defendant seeks a new trial only on the issue of damages for personal injuries.
Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the court erred in allowing plaintiff’s doctor to testify, in response to a hypothetical question, that plaintiff’s hospitalization subsequent to the accident could, or might, have been caused by the accident. The doctor, who was stipulated to be a medical expert, testified that he had treated plaintiff for a diabetic condition for several years. On at least one occasion prior to the accident he had admitted her to the hospital for treatment. When he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Rodgers v. BoyntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Potts v. HowserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Pascal Ex Rel. Pascal v. Burke Transit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Harris v. Atlantic Greyhound CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wesley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Griffin v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Howell v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974