Howell v. Nichols
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the court improperly excluded testimony from Dr. James A. Sanders to the effect that the pain suffered by plaintiff “could be indefinite or prolonged for an indefinite period of time.” We hold that the testimony was properly excluded. The substance of Sanders’ testimony is as follows. Complaining of discomfort in her neck, plaintiff came to Sanders for treatment on 7 July 1971, about three weeks after the accident. At the time, plaintiff “had limitation of motion in her neck. ...” and indicated “discomfort over the medial border. The medial refers to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gillikin v. BurbageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Short v. Chapman Ex Rel. RhoneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Potts v. HowserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Gibbs v. Carolina Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Johnson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doe v. Bayer Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Lee v. ReganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980