Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hathaway v. Middle Tennessee Anesthesiology

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 29, 1986Published

1ConcurrenceKoch, Judge

The sole issue in this case is whether the “discovery rule” generally applied in personal tort actions is available in medical malpractice cases in which the injured party has died as a result of the negligent act. The majority has concluded that it does, and I concur with this result. It was foretold in Gosnell v. Ashland Chemical, Inc., 674 S.W.2d 737, 739 (Tenn.Ct.App.1984). Notwithstanding the appellees’ criticism of this case, it has been approved by the Tennessee Supreme Court.1

At common law, every right of action for personal injury abated with the death of the injured person. Trafford…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Teeters v. CurreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  2. McCroskey v. Bryant Air Conditioning CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Foster v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Memphis Street Railway Company v. CooperTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Southeastern Aviation, Inc. v. HurdTennessee Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API