Legal Opinion

Walker v. Griffin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 7, 1924No. 13385PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLydick, J.

In consideration of the cancellation of certain stock previously sold and issued by the Walker Refining Company to J. H. Griffin, tliat company executed and delivered its certain negotiable promissory note, payablfe'td the order of the said J. H. Griffin "and: ihdo-rsed by Alex AValker personally. The''indorsement appeared upon the back 'of ■ the hote and contained these words': “1 -güárd-ntée payment of this note,” and immediately beneath such indorsement Alex' Walker" wiiote his "name. J. H. Griffin indorsed the sail!1 note in blank and sold and delivered'- th'é'5sainé tó John Griffin, who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Co. v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893
  2. Masters v. BoyesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Commercial Bank v. Cheshire Provident InstitutionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seymour Improvement Co. v. Viking Sprinkler Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Rabon v. PutnamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  3. Janeway v. VandeventerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Kenyon v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API