Legal Opinion
Commercial Bank v. Cheshire Provident Institution
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided May 7, 1898No. 10631PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error from Montgomery District Court. A. H. Skid-more, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The defendant in error obtained judgment- against the Commercial Bank, for $2685, on a guaranty^ in the following form, indorsed on a negotiable promissory note executed by Daniel Dart:
“For value received, the Commercial Bank hereby guarantees prompt payment of the interest on the within obligation and the payment of the principal at maturity. Witness our hands this 12th day of May, - 1886. Geo. T. Gunersey, Cashier. L. U. Humphrey, President.”
The note was made payable to the order of the Topeka Investment & Loan Company, and was by it indorsed before maturity to the Cheshire Provident…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stillman v. . NorthrupNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- McLaren v. Watson's ExecutorsNew York Supreme Court · 1841
- Claflin v. . OstromNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Partridge v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
- Arkansas Valley Town & Land Co. v. LincolnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ward v. JoslinSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Morisette v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Ward v. JoslinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
- Walker v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924