State v. Messmer
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
*202The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
The defendant appeals from a conviction of having intoxicating liquor in his possession.
1. It is argued that there was “error of the court in refusing to admit competent evidence offered by defendant on objection of plaintiff.” The evidence which the defendant desired to introduce was that of a physician who, if he had been permitted, would have testified that in 1914 and in 1920 he treated Mrs. Messmer, the wife of the defendant, for acute heart trouble, and then administered whisky to her for that trouble. The evidence, if admitted,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SorterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad v. IrwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- City of Kansas v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- State v. McCoolSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. NethertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- State v. VandruffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- State v. BonomoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- State v. CrigerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- State v. FadlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928