Legal Opinion

Noble v. Blount

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 59 opinions

Appeal from Andrew Circuit Court. — Hon. H. S. Kelley, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Philips, C.

This is an action by respondent, who was plaintiff below, against the appellant, who was defendant below, to recover for balance due on a promissory note executed to her by appellant. The answer admitted the allegations of the petition. The contention in the case is over the second count.of the answer, in which the defend*236ant pleaded, in substance, that after making the note sued on he became surety for plaintiff on a note executed by them to one Samuel Dysart, for $400. The answer further alleged that defendant derived no benefit from the last named note; that on the 9th day of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Acheson v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1849
  2. State v. HopperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Leabo v. GoodeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Spurlock v. SprouleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  5. Mauerman v. SiemertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Holmes v. BraidwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Chase v. DriverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  3. Whitmore v. Supreme Lodge Knights & Ladies of HonorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  4. Conrad v. FisherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. National Loan & Investment Co. v. Rockland Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API