Skookum Oil Co. v. Thomas
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This appeal is here for further consideration after decision by the district court of appeal for the third appellate district affirming a judgment in favor of the defendant.
The action was brought to recover the sum of twenty thousand dollars received by defendant from R. L. Patterson, W. E. Dingley, and H. H. Dingley, assignors of plaintiff and from plaintiff pursuant to a certain option to purchase land. The court made a general finding that the averments of the complaint, except as to the corporate capacity of plaintiff, were untrue, and rendered judgment in favor of defendant. The appeal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Waterman v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Oursler v. ThacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Sprague v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by37 opinions
- Moore v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Hoppin v. MunseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Henck v. Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Schwerin Estate Realty Co. v. SlyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.