Legal Opinion

In Re the Domestic Partnership of Raimer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 31, 1993No. 89-656-D-1; CA A67271PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

This is an action for division of property after the breakdown of a nonmarital relationship. The trial court awarded plaintiff judgment for one-half of the $30,000 appreciation on defendant’s ranch and $6,000 for items plaintiff had purchased for the ranch. Defendant appeals.

Defendant first assigns error to the trial court’s determination that the parties had formed a domestic partnership. However, under Beal v. Beal, 282 Or 115, 577 P2d 507 (1978), the critical inquiry is not whether their relationship can be labeled a “domestic partnership.” Rather, the question is the intention of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beal v. BealOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Shuraleff v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pinto v. SmalzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. In re StavelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API