Legal Opinion

Beal v. Beal

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1978No. A-76-07-09929, SC 25319PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*117HOWELL, J.

This is an appeal from a decree fixing the interests of the plaintiff, Raymond Beal, and the defendant, Barbara Beal, in a residence in Portland. The trial court found that the parties each owned an undivided one-half interest in the property. The plaintiff appeals.

As the Beals were not husband and wife at any time relevant to this suit, this is the first time this court has been asked to decide the principles to be applied in determining the property rights of the parties in property accumulated while they were living together unmarried.1

The parties were divorced in March, 1972.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Estate of ThorntonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hanns v. HannsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. West v. KnowlesWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Keene v. KeeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Watts v. WattsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hewitt v. HewittIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Blumenthal v. BrewerIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Boland v. CatalanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Wood v. CollinsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API