Legal Opinion

Shuraleff v. Donnelly

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 11, 1991No. 16-89-00354; CA A64343PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

In this action arising after the breakdown of a 14-year nonmarital domestic relationship, both parties appeal the trial court’s division of property. We affirm on the appeal and on the cross-appeal.

The parties met in June, 1973, when plaintiff rented a room in defendant’s residence in Fall Creek. Within a short time they began an intimate relationship and lived together until January, 1989. At the time the relationship began, plaintiff had between ten and fifteen thousand dollars and defendant owned the Fall Creek property, which consisted of five acres and a log house. In 1975 the log house…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beal v. BealOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Latham v. HennesseyWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Warden v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. Rissberger v. GortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Collins v. GuggenheimMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. Wilbur v. DeLappCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. In Matter of Domestic Partnership of BranamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Pinto v. SmalzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. In Re the Domestic Partnership of RaimerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API