Legal Opinion

In re Staveland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 5, 2018No. A163944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

*212Respondent Fisher appeals a general judgment of dissolution of a nonmarital domestic relationship and a supplemental judgment awarding attorney fees to petitioner. Respondent asserts three assignments of error. In the first assignment, he argues that the trial court erred when it ruled that petitioner Staveland was entitled to half of the appreciation in value of respondent's house (the Dickinson house) that occurred while she lived there with respondent. In a second assignment, respondent challenges the trial court's calculation of appreciation, arguing that the court erred by awarding…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. RobertiOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Beal v. BealOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In re the Marriage of OlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Staveland and FisherOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In re Domestic Partnership of JolingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API