Legal Opinion

Anderson v. St. Francis-St. George Hospital, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1996No. 95-869PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

We are presented with the following question: Where a medical provider administers a life-prolonging treatment or procedure to a patient against the patient’s instructions, is the medical provider liable for all foreseeable consequential damages resulting from the treatment or procedure? This is a case of first impression, and presents this court with the issues raised by a claim of “wrongful living.” In its simplest form, the question becomes: Is “continued living” a compensable injury?

American jurisprudence has developed at least three civil actions relating to the beginning and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Love v. City of Port ClintonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Cockrum v. BaumgartnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Hester v. DwivediOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Rieger v. Giant Eagle, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Ackison v. Anchor Packing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Carpenter v. Scherer-Mountain Insurance AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Eastman v. Stanley WorksOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API