Legal Opinion
Joseph T. Huey v. Daniel Stine, Correctional Officer, Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 11, 2000No. 99-1848PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
Joseph T. Huey, a prisoner in the Michigan Department of Corrections, appeals from a district court judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim as barred by the doctrine of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
On February 18, 1998, Joseph T. Huey, an inmate at the Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility, received a major misconduct ticket. The ticket alleged that Huey had assaulted corrections officer Daniel Stine in an attempt to gain control of a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Muhammad v. CloseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ramirez v. GalazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ramirez v. GalazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Powers v. Hamilton County Public Defender CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Shakur Muhammad, A/K/A John E. Mease v. Mark CloseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.