Baker v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR MARICOPA CTY.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULT, Judge.
This special action came on regularly for conference. After taking the matter under advisement, we accepted jurisdiction and denied relief, with a written opinion to follow.
BACKGROUND
In November 1996, Arizona voters passed “Proposition 200,” an initiative measure formally entitled “The Drug Medicalization, Prevention, and Control Act of 1996” (“the Act”). 1 The Act, which became effective upon the Governor’s proclamation on December 6, 1996, 2 altered the statutory sentencing scheme for persons convicted of possessing or using marijuana or controlled substances. Petitioners…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. PintoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Airness & Accountability in Insurance Reform v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Fry's Food Stores of Arizona, Inc. v. Mather & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State v. ScrivnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Pennartz v. OlcavageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- O'BRIEN v. EscherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. HolmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Raney v. LindbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.