Legal Opinion

Baker v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR MARICOPA CTY.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 9, 1997No. 1 CA-SA 97-0084, 1 CA-SA 97-0089PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULT, Judge.

This special action came on regularly for conference. After taking the matter under advisement, we accepted jurisdiction and denied relief, with a written opinion to follow.

BACKGROUND

In November 1996, Arizona voters passed “Proposition 200,” an initiative measure formally entitled “The Drug Medicalization, Prevention, and Control Act of 1996” (“the Act”). 1 The Act, which became effective upon the Governor’s proclamation on December 6, 1996, 2 altered the statutory sentencing scheme for persons convicted of possessing or using marijuana or controlled substances. Petitioners…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. PintoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Airness & Accountability in Insurance Reform v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona, Inc. v. Mather & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. State v. ScrivnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. Pennartz v. OlcavageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. O'BRIEN v. EscherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. HolmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. Raney v. LindbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API