Legal Opinion
Nwachukwu v. Karl
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 2, 2004No. CIV.A.02-0469(RMU)PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs motion to alter or amend judgment.1 On May 27, 2004, the defendant filed a motion to amend his answer. Although the plaintiff filed his memorandum in opposition to the defendant’s motion on June 9, 2004, it was not docketed until June 16, 2004. On June 14, 2004, after the plaintiff filed his opposition but before it was docketed, the court entered its order granting the defendant’s motion to amend his answer. The plaintiff then…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- John W. Dussouy, Jr. v. Gulf Coast Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Abdullah v. WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Sheppard v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Wilson v. FullwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Bond v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- New Vision Photography Program, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.